Праведник спасается
от беды, а вместо него попадает в нее нечестивый (Притчи 11:8)[1]
‘Susannah’ was the codename given to an ill-fated
‘false flag’ intelligence operation which took place in Egypt in July 1954. A
team of agents provocateurs made up of locally-born Jews and Israeli nationals
was assigned the task of planting bombs in Egyptian, US and British-owned
cultural centres such as cinemas and libraries. While the danger to civilians
was minimised (by ensuring the explosives detonated after the target premises
had closed), the operational objective – to inflict damage on Cairo’s relations
with Washington and London by creating a climate of violence and instability -
was nonetheless malevolent and disreputable. Exposed by a double agent, several
suspects were rounded up; two committed suicide in custody, two were executed,
others received lengthy prison sentences. The plot caused significant political
turmoil in Jerusalem, manifested by the resignation of Defence Minister Pinhas
Lavon in February 1955, though official denials of responsibility continued for
decades afterwards. Only in March 2005 were the surviving members of the spy
ring finally accorded state recognition for their efforts, in a ceremony
conducted by the now disgraced Israeli president, Moshe Katsav.[2]
Below are excerpts from the Wikipedia article on the
‘Hindawi affair’:
“On the morning of 17 April 1986, at Heathrow Airport
in London, Israeli security guards working for El Al airlines found 1.5
kilograms (3.3 lb) of Semtex explosives in the bag of Anne-Marie Murphy, a
five-month pregnant Irishwoman attempting to fly on a flight with 375 fellow
passengers to Tel Aviv. In addition, a functioning calculator in the bag was
found to be a timed triggering device. She claimed to be unaware of the
contents, and that she had been given the bag by her fiancé, Nezar Hindawi, a
Jordanian. Murphy maintained that Hindawi had sent her on the flight for the
purpose of meeting his parents before marriage. A manhunt ensued, resulting in
Hindawi's arrest the following day after he surrendered to police. Hindawi was
found guilty by a British court in the Old Bailey and received 45 years imprisonment,
believed to be the longest determinate, or fixed, criminal sentence in British
history.
During the trial [in October 1986] Hindawi retracted
his confession and claimed that he was the victim of a conspiracy, probably by
Israeli agents. He claimed that the police forced him to sign the statements
attributed to him unread, threatened to hand him over to Mossad and told him
that his parents were also arrested in London.
In attempting to construct a credible defence for
his client, Hindawi's legal counsel proposed an alternative interpretation of
events during the trial, suggesting that Hindawi was being manipulated by
Israeli intelligence, which wished to damage and embarrass the Syrian
government. The jury was unconvinced by this version of events, and subsequent
appeal judges have dismissed such interpretations as entirely lacking in
evidence.
After the court found Hindawi guilty, the then
British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher broke off diplomatic relations with
Syria. Following this the United States and Canada recalled their ambassadors
from Syria.”
Until it was tampered with in September 2013, the
section headed ‘Allegations of Mossad involvement’ read as follows:
“On 10 November 1986, the French prime minister
Jacques Chirac said in interview with the Washington Times, that German
chancellor Kohl and foreign minister Genscher both believed that "the
Hindawi plot was a provocation designed to embarrass Syria and destabilize the
Assad regime ... 'by' ... people probably connected to Israeli Mossad".
Chirac added that he tended to believe it himself.[3]
In his interview with Time magazine on 20 October
1986, Syrian president Hafez al-Assad alleged that the Israeli intelligence
agency planned the Hindawi operation.
Patrick Seale[4]
writes that the Hindawi family (from the Jordanian village of Baqura) had a
history of connection to Mossad. Hindawi's father was a cook for the Jordanian
embassy in London, he was revealed by Jordanians as a Mossad agent, tried in
absentia in Jordan, sentenced to death, but escaped his sentence by staying in
Britain. Jordanian sources revealed to Seale that Hindawi himself worked for
money for several foreign intelligence services, including Mossad.
According to Seale, sources in Syrian intelligence
told him that they "had fallen into Israeli trap" and were penetrated
and manipulated by Mossad to smear Syria with terrorism and isolate it
internationally. Colonel Mufid Akkur, whom Hindawi named in court, was arrested
in Damascus on suspicion of working for Israel.[5]
Speculation of Mossad involvement is however
contradicted by considerable evidence of Syrian sponsorship, including
Hindawi's statements on interrogation, correspondence intercepted by the
authorities after his arrest, the testimony of other captured terrorists, and
the support provided by Syrian Arab Airlines. The Syrian government's claim
that the Mossad replaced originally innocent luggage with the bomb is refuted
by the discovery of hair belonging to Hindawi trapped under the tape used to
attach the explosive to the bag.”[6]
In the December 1986 edition of ‘Washington Report
on Middle East Affairs’, in an article entitled ‘Hafez Al-Assad—Too Clever By
Half’, Richard H. Curtiss asked:
“El Al Flight: What Were Syria's Motives?
There are a few Americans, many of whom have
telephoned this publication in the past two weeks, who think Assad got a bad
rap when a British court convicted Nezar Hindawi of trying to blow up an El Al
airplane between London and Tel Aviv. The British Government said Hindawi was
linked by intercepted messages to the chief of Syria's air force intelligence
and the Syrian Ambassador in London. The evidence introduced in court, these
skeptics point out, was a suitcase containing explosives and a timing device
handed over to the British by an Israeli security agent. Mossad is capable of
switching suitcases and, for that matter, of faking telephone calls and coded
messages to and from Syria's London embassy that could be intercepted by the
British, the skeptics note. They ask what possible benefit there would be to
the Syrian government in blowing up 375 innocent civilians—200 of them US
citizens—in mid-air, an action that would irretrievably disgrace Syria if it
were caught, and which it therefore could never admit to, even if it were not.
The benefit, these skeptics say, is only to Israel,
which is deeply concerned about Syrian ground-to-air and ground-to-ground
missiles, and looking for western backing for an attack against them.”
All of which surely begs the question: if the 'Lavon
affair' (as it became known), in conjunction with just a fraction of Mossad’s
myriad other clandestine activities, had been common knowledge in Britain in
1986, isn’t it reasonable to assume that Nezar Hindawi’s defence case would have
been taken more seriously?
[1] The
righteous person is rescued from trouble, and it falls on the wicked instead
(Proverbs 11:8)
[2] Convicted
in 2010 and sentenced to 7 years in prison for rape, sexual harassment,
committing an indecent act while using force, harassing a witness and
obstruction of justice.
[3] Seale:
‘Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East’, 1993 p.249
[4] Patrick
Abram Seale, b. May 1930, d. April 2014. Respected Belfast-born British
journalist and author of ‘Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East’;
‘Abu Nidal: A Gun for Hire’; and ‘The Struggle for Arab Independence: Riad
el-Solh and the Makers of the Modern Middle East’.
[5] Seale
1993 pp.250-252
[6] http://www.danielpipes.org/article/1064
"Terrorism: The Syrian Connection" by Daniel Pipes, originally
published in The National Interest, Spring 1989
An extended critique of Sir Robert Owen's report on the murder of Alexander Litvinenko follows if you click on 'Older Post' here and at the foot of subsequent pages.
ReplyDelete